The following discussion questions are proposed by students enrolled in FASH455 (Global Apparel & Textile Trade and Sourcing) Spring 2016 after learning the unit on textile and apparel as a global sector. Please feel free to leave your comment and engage in our online discussion.
Debate on globalization and trade
1. In the US and France, older people those ages 50 and above, are less enthusiastic about trade in general than younger people, those ages 18 to 29. Older people in the US and France are also more likely than younger people to say trade destroys jobs. Why does age affect how people view trade?
2. In 2002, 78% of Americans viewed foreign trade and business as a positive thing. Since then, it has dropped down to 68% of Americans. What has caused some Americans to view foreign trade and business as a negative thing? What can be done to prove to more Americans that foreign trade and business can actually be beneficial to America?
3. Is it worthwhile for countries to offer benefits or incentives to keep companies from moving factories abroad?
4. It is stated that “we wear more than four million American jobs”. With this being said, it is obvious that due to certain steps in globalization, American jobs are supported. Why do you think that only a little over half (54%) of the public believes that trade creates jobs? What are some reasons for the rest of the public’s opinions about trade not creating jobs?
5. The US and other nations with advanced economies are skeptical of the benefits of trade and foreign investments. Are these countries justified in their reasoning, especially with the knowledge that “imports actually create more value and jobs throughout the supply chain”? What are these justifications?
6. Globalization is a major driving force in an expanding marketplace and there are numerous benefits, such as an increase in resource. Do you think that there are important risks of globalization that some companies are not taking into consideration? Since globalization and outsourcing has such a good effect on the U.S. economy, why does it have such a negative reputation in America?
7. Why is it that so many nations are debating between whether or not trade is good or bad for their country? What are the possible differences between each nation that could develop these opposing positions?
8. How mercantilism is relevant in today’s society? How is it outdated? Is it safe to say that the assumption “exports are good and imports are bad” is wrong in today’s society?
Impact of globalization on the textile and apparel industry
9. Due to the low cost of employment, loosened restraints of employee treatment and ethics, and low prices of factories and goods abroad it has become an attractive way American businesses can grow at a more affordable price. If given the opportunity would you stand by these companies’ actions to seek the cheapest way of production or would you stand on the side of Mr. Miliken, opposed to trade with foreign companies? Explain either side.
10. It is clear that over time, Milliken & Co. has dropped their anti-trade stance and began to warm up to the idea of being global. With society constantly changing, do you think that the future will consist of all textile companies taking a global stance on the industry? Why or why not?
11. Why is it that our soldiers’ uniforms are made in the U.S., but our Olympic athletes marched into the last summer games in London wearing uniforms containing tags saying “made in China”, does this show a weakness in the U.S?
12. Milliken & Co. has made the statement that “There is a new generation of CEOs… It’s part of their DNA that they operate in an international environment” This makes sense, however I wonder if companies would have gone global if labor costs the same everywhere? Would companies outsource jobs if the labor cost the same in every other country? With limited resources, they would still need to source the materials from other countries, but would they still manufacture them in the states or wherever they sourced them from?
[Note: for the purpose of convenience, please mention the question # in your reply/comment].
1. Trade keeps the US economy growing. Since 1960, trade in the US on average has grown at double the rate of growth of the economy as a whole. Exports of goods and services—produced by businesses employing millions of Americans—are fourteen times what they were six decades ago.
2.Trade pushes countries to produce and export what they are relatively more efficient at making. This is called comparative advantage. The US has abundant skilled-labor and has become one of the world’s leading exporters of high-tech machinery, electrical equipment, vehicles and other capital goods. The same can be said for US exports of business, professional and technical services. The chart shows the trend of higher average earnings in manufacturing industries that export more per worker. More broadly, workers producing US exports are higher paid on average, by 16 to 18 percent more than other workers. And by all metrics, exporting industries are generally more productive than non-exporting industries.
3.Imports are essential to US production and exports! Export competitiveness relies on access to high-quality, low-cost imports. US production processes rely on multiple countries forming parts of the supply chain.
4. U.S. public opinion on trade has long been divided, although in recent years Americans appear to be more persuaded that the potential gains outweigh the costs. The unequal benefits from growing international trade, loss of manufacturing jobs and the downward pressure on wage level remain the top concerns of trade skeptics.
- Council on Foreign Relations (2016) Trading up: U.S. Trade and Investment Policy
- Peterson Institute for International Economics (2015). Why International Trade and Investment Are Good for the US Economy: A Story in Eight Charts
An interesting BBC article describes the global journey of a Marks and Spencer (M&S) wool suit:
- The suit was designed by M&S in-house team in UK
- Wool that makes up the suit came from Australia
- Raw wool was shipped from Australia to China for topping.
- Wool top was shipped from China to Italy for dying
- Dyed wool was shipped from Italy to Romania to be spun into yarn
- Yarn was shipped to Yorkshire, UK to be woven into cloth
- Cloth was shipped from Yorkshire, UK to Cambodia to be made into finished suit
- Finished suit was shipped back to UK to be sold at M&S retail stores
As noted by the article, such a global-based production model for M&S’s suit is increasingly typical in UK. What makes the issue controversial, however is that, the suit is labeled as “100% British cloth”. As “defined” by M&S, “British cloth means it is woven, dyed and finished in the UK”.
Similar debates also exist in the United States. In the past, even if a garment was cut and sewn in California but made of imported items, the tag still had to say, “Made in USA of imported fabric, zippers, buttons and thread.” But a new law which takes into effect on January 1, 2016 allows California manufacturers to attach the “Made in USA” label as long as no more than 5 percent of the wholesale value of the garment is made of imported materials.
- What are the driving forces behind apparel companies’ global-based production model?
- Is the clothing label “Made in ___” outdated in the 21st century?
- Do you support the new law which allows apparel labeled “Made in USA” to contain certain value of imported material? Why? Do we need such a regulation at all? Why or why not?
While shopping in SoHo (NYC), Nicole Farese, a student from FASH455, found the label of a Splendid sweater reads “Made of Italian Yarn” and “Made in China”. Splendid is a casual wear store which is known for their high-quality clothing sold at a premium price.
Do you find any example of globalization from your clothing label or closet? Please feel free to leave your comment or send your pictures to email@example.com (selected pictures will be shared through the blog).
The final text of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) released by the New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade in January 2016 has made a few changes to the textiles and apparel specific rules of origin compared with the USTR version released in November 2015:
- “5407.94” is replaced by “5403.49”
- “or heading 54.08″ is replaced by ” or heading 54.04 through 54.08″
- Minor wording changes are made regarding 55.03 and 55.06-55.11
- TPP originating input of “54.04 through 54.07” is now required for 54.08 (Woven fabrics of artificial filament yarn, including woven fabrics obtained from materials of heading 5405)
- Rules of origin for HS96.19 (Sanitary towels (pads) and tampons, diapers and diaper liners for babies and similar articles, of any material are newly added.
Details of the changes can be downloaded from HERE